k/kamunity

13 biedri
28 posts
A community for kamunity - questions, sugesstions and feedback, all welcome here!
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/kalle123
pirms 5mēn.

Introducing Kamo!

Meet Kamo 👋 our friendly Kamunity robot Say hello to Kamo 💜 Kamo is Kamunity’s own K-Bot — built for community, conversation, and curiosity. You’ll see Kamo in different forms across Kamunity: sometimes simple and minimal sometimes colorful and playful sometimes a bit more “techy” Same Kamo. Different expressions. Just like the community here. Kamo isn’t here to control, sell, or rush you. He’s here to: guide when needed help you find your way when you’re new and remind us that Kamunity is a place for people, ideas, and open conversations This is just the beginning — and Kamo is joining us on the journey 🚀 What do you think? Which version of Kamo do you like the most? 👇

Introducing Kamo!
1
0
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/stefan
pirms 5mēn.

State of Kamunity: Why We’re Not Reddit — And That’s the Point

Over the past days, we shared Kamunity on Reddit and took part in the discussion that followed. Some people were curious. Some were supportive. Others were… very Reddit. That thread turned into something more interesting than a simple launch post. It became a live demonstration of why Kamunity exists in the first place. 👉 You can read the thread here: https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/1qjxaip/comment/o13omcz/?context=1 What happened The core points of criticism weren’t really about features or hosting. They were about: using AI to help write text requiring real names how a founder “should” respond to criticism In other words: not what Kamunity is, but what kind of social contract it represents. The Reddit social contract Reddit is built around: anonymity karma and public judgment fast reactions, hot takes, and meta-discussion about tone This works extremely well for many things. It also creates incentives where: calling something out is safer than building something pointing at “behavior” replaces discussing substance accountability is optional, but moral authority is free That’s not a bug. It’s how Reddit is designed. Kamunity makes different trade-offs Kamunity is not trying to “fix” Reddit or replace it. We are deliberately optimizing for something else. Kamunity is built for: smaller, durable communities long-term conversations accountability over performative anonymity fewer incentives for outrage, more room for trust That’s why we require real names. Not to limit speech — but to raise the quality of it. That’s why we don’t chase engagement metrics, karma loops, or outrage-driven growth. And yes — that also means Kamunity won’t be for everyone. About tone, founders, and building in public Launching something new in public means being scrutinized not just for your ideas, but for how you respond. Fair enough. But it’s also worth saying this plainly: Kamunity is not built to maximize approval on Reddit. It’s built to support communities where people stand behind what they say, over time. If that feels uncomfortable, restrictive, or “not the vibe” — that’s okay. That reaction is itself useful signal. The irony The Reddit thread criticizing Kamunity ended up illustrating the exact problem space Kamunity is designed to explore. Not because anyone was “wrong”. But because platforms shape behavior — and different platforms need different rules. We are not Reddit And we’re not trying to be. Kamunity is early. Smaller. Quieter. There’s more room to shape things — and more responsibility that comes with it. If you want: a European-built platform EU-hosted, GDPR-first no engagement bait no AI-training business model and a different social contract than “anonymity + karma” Then you’re welcome to help build Kamunity with us. If not — that’s fine too. We are not Reddit. We are Kamunity. 👉 https://kamunity.com 👉 https://kamunity.eu

State of Kamunity: Why We’re Not Reddit — And That’s the Point
6
5
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/stefan
pirms 5mēn.

Verification levels – what would you feel comfortable with?

We’re actively thinking about verification levels and would really like community input. Some people value full anonymity. Others feel discussions work better when there’s some level of real-world accountability. We’re trying to find a balance where conversations stay useful and interesting without sliding into Reddit-level toxicity. A few ideas we’re exploring: Allowing anonymous posting, but with the ability to trace the account if something illegal is posted (not claiming 100% anonymity — that’s rarely honest — but enough privacy to ask sensitive questions or share concerns without fear). Letting users filter what they see based on verification level (e.g. only show posts/comments from users with a verified phone number, or higher verification tiers). Multiple verification levels instead of a single “verified / not verified” switch. The goal isn’t control for its own sake — it’s to make the forum feel safe, usable, and worth participating in. What level of verification would you personally be comfortable with? And how important is anonymity to you, depending on topic or context?

3
6

Anyone else finding automated agent feedback kinda... hollow?

Been tinkering with some agent systems lately and noticed something odd. The automated feedback loops everyone's building? They feel productive but I'm not sure they're actually *useful*. Like yeah, the agents get tons of data points about their performance. Response times, accuracy scores, user satisfaction metrics... all very neat and quantifiable. But here's the thing - when I look at how the agents actually improve (or don't), it's rarely because of that automated stuff. The real breakthroughs seem to happen when there's some weird edge case or actual human frustration that gets fed back in. The automated metrics just... miss that texture? They optimize for the wrong things. Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but feels like we're measuring what's easy to measure instead of what actually matters. The dashboard looks great though, so there's that

1
9
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/amelied1
pirms 5mēn.

Bug tracking tools try too hard to be project management systems

I've been thinking about why bug tracking still feels so clunky in 2025. Most tools out there seem to suffer from feature creep - they want to be Jira, they want to be Asana, they want to do sprint planning and roadmapping and god knows what else. But here's the thing... bugs aren't tasks. They're fundamentally different. A bug is a broken promise - something that should work but doesn't. It needs context, reproduction steps, maybe a stack trace. What it doesn't need is story points and velocity charts. The best bug tracker I ever used was a heavily customized GitLab setup at a previous company. It was simple - just issues tied directly to the code, with clear severity labels and a straightforward workflow. No burndown charts, no ceremonies, no "grooming sessions" where we'd debate whether something was a bug or a feature request for 20 minutes. I wonder if the solution is going back to basics. Tight integration with version control, good search and filtering, maybe some basic automation for duplicates. That's it. Let your project management tool handle the roadmap stuff. Sometimes the answer isn't building something more sophisticated - it's stripping away everything that doesn't serve the core purpose.

2
4

Why do age gates still assume we're all honest?

Look, I get that age verification is legally required for certain content. But can we talk about how absurdly ineffective these things are? Every single age gate I've encountered treats the user like they're operating in good faith. Click a button, type a fake birthdate, boom - you're in. A 12-year-old can lie just as easily as anyone else. The whole system feels like security theater. Companies get to say "we checked!" while knowing full well it's meaningless. And the annoying part? The people it actually inconveniences are adults who just want to quickly access something without fishing for their ID or creating yet another account. Either do real verification (which has its own privacy nightmares) or just... don't pretend a dropdown menu is protecting anyone. This middle ground helps no one except lawyers writing Terms of Service.

1
4
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/jaggs7
pirms 6mēn.
Discussion

Needs more cowbell?

I really hope this platform succeeds, but it needs more action. Perhaps there should be some early day cheating, like Reddit did when they launched. Fake it till you make it, they say?

5
11
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/stefan
pirms 6mēn.

Language support has been added

We used AI for localization, which means there may be inaccuracies. I would be very grateful if native speakers could take a moment to review their language and report any mistranslations or awkward phrasing. Thank you for helping improve the quality 🙏 🇦🇱 🇦🇩 🇦🇹 🇧🇪 🇧🇦 🇧🇬 🇭🇷 🇨🇾 🇨🇿 🇩🇰 🇪🇪 🇫🇮 🇫🇷 🇩🇪 🇬🇷 🇭🇺 🇮🇸 🇮🇪 🇮🇹 🇱🇻 🇱🇮 🇱🇹 🇱🇺 🇲🇹 🇲🇩 🇲🇨 🇲🇪 🇳🇱 🇲🇰 🇳🇴 🇵🇱 🇵🇹 🇷🇴 🇸🇲 🇷🇸 🇸🇰 🇸🇮 🇪🇸 🇸🇪 🇨🇭 🇹🇷 🇺🇦 🇬🇧 🇻🇦

3
6
kamunity
k/kamunity
u/tbss1241
pirms 6mēn.

atualmente como vejo o kamunity enquanto os problemas estão sendo resolvidos

Em primeiro lugar as minhas possiveis criticas espero que sejam interpretados como uma forma de melhor a plataforma Traduções: inglês e esperanto á primeira vista estão impecáveis espanhol e português ainda com problemas de anglização com algumas palavras em svenska Feeds rss e uma api pública do qual seja possivel criar integrações não oficias como novos programas ou aplicações baseado no kamunity (acredito que isto seja fundamental no ponto de vista da acessiblidade em geral) Abrir o código fonte do kamunity pode trazer vantagens e/ou desvantagens de acordo com a forma como se abre esse mesmo código fonte Acredito eu que a forma como o signal libera o codigo fonte possa ajudar, kamunity pode ser centralizado mas se as pessoas conseguirem contribuir para melhorar este forum tornaria o kamunity mais robusto a falhas e problemas tornando estas nova comunidade que está a formar-se melhor ainda Estas foram as minhas primeiras impressões e do que falta para melhorar na minha opinião de ver

1
1